2012 Presidential Debate

2012 Presidential Debate: Andrew Sullivan, The Daily Beast reported Sunday, October 3rd debate between President Obama and his Republican rival, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, dramatically changed the dynamics of the race. Rather than go into oblivion, Romney ahead of Obama in the polls and growing. If you're Romney, a lesson for future talks on Tuesday is simple: to be the same guy you were in the first. It means to be a strong, vibrant and clear, but they are sure occasional note of moderation (eg, "The situation is critical.") And any attack Obama. If you're Obama, much higher hurdle. Many commentators believe that the issue of the president of Denver was that he seemed to be off, even disinterested. It is quite easy to fix, it's just a question of militancy display shows Obama during the election campaign. But as tempting as it may be for one to Obama, President stylistic issue? Considering how much to spend on advertising campaigns - Romney has raised $ 170 million in September alone, Obama raised $ 181 million, placing nearly $ 1 billion in total - it is hard to imagine that voters ( particular country swing) t aren 'familiar with the basic steps for each candidate. What has changed in the debate have been reported candidates as well as their delivery. Romney was strong, Obama was not.

There are at least two problems with this line of reasoning, however. First, much of the debate has focused on the details of the policy, such as Romney's proposed tax cuts shift the tax burden from the rich to American middle and low income, or Obama care will allow the government to dictate how doctors treat patients. Thus, although there are obvious differences in the presentation, there were large differences in the substance. Perhaps these differences were so compelling, if not more, than the energy gap of candidates.
Second, Obama faces the challenge on the merits, it is more difficult than Romney. As the current president must convince people to stick to its approach to management. It is difficult to do when unemployment is high and economic growth is anemic. Obama could try to overcome this obstacle is to define a large bold plan to create jobs and American businesses moving again, accused congressional Republicans to block. Instead, he proposed small arms proposals over a year. If voters really feel outrage at the proposal of the Republican sandbags Obama to raise taxes on companies that export jobs, and call for more training programs in colleges? All Romney to do, however, offers a robust change in direction. He did by offering tax cuts general revision of the tax code and cuts in federal spending. His plan does not apply to Democrats, and there are many analysts and economists are skeptical that Romney can do the jobs. But he did not propose to stay the course, Obama, that's for sure.
Two senior advisers to Democratic candidates, James Carville and Stan Greenberg, argued Monday that Barack Obama "may offer a bold narrative, politics and choice" for voters if he expects to win in November. "The first debate really disrupt the race is a painful and in real time, what happens when the president is trying to convince people to move forward and provide a very modest change," they write. "Voters are not looking for continuity, but the changes that will help the average Joe."
Obama was the candidate of change four years ago, but it was about to change the way Washington works, Obama has done with great success. Many voters now want to change in the economy and their future prospects. If Obama is to change your slides should not only conform to the style points to discuss Romney Tuesday. It can offer a good reason why he is a candidate for voters who want to release this year's changes.